3 Responses

1. CaroR

   November 24th, 2009 at 2:00 am

   1

   you’re not actually comparing football to cricket, are you?
   politically, who cares. the politicians are only good for making sure the country gets the stadiums built in time.
   safety, i think its alright. i mean, (not to be offensive) mexico has hosted it twice and mexico i heard was the 2nd most dangerous place to live on earth besides Iraq. dont believe those that think South Africa can’t host it. I actually want to go to South Africa to watch the world cup cause i wanna see what africa is like!

2. S B

   November 24th, 2009 at 5:42 am

   2

   FIFA doesn’t have the political will to change things now–no matter how bad things are–so the question should be: “How bad is it going to be for the fans and players at the 2010 WC?”
   ANSWER: Very Bad. Crime will be wide-spread and the hotel/infrastructure will not be sufficient. Everything will be much more expensive than expected (Gouging will be rampant). Best Case is these isn’t A LOT of murders and there isn’t rampant prostitution/HIV transmission.

3. Michael S

   November 24th, 2009 at 10:22 am

   3

   Yes, all they half to do is create a nice facility